type performance-improvements

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich for CMSSW_14_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

• DQM/BeamMonitor (db, dqm)

@antoniovagnerini, @atpathak, @cmsbuild, @consuegs, @francescobrivio, @nothingface0, @perrotta, @rvenditti, @syuvivida, @tjavaid can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@JanChyczynski, @PonIlya, @francescobrivio, @mmusich, @rsreds, @yuanchao this is something you requested to watch as well.
@antoniovilela, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

• Backported from make AlcaBeamMonitor hoard less memory #46451

cms-bot internal usage

@cmsbuild, please test

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-7a45ed/42328/summary.html
COMMIT: 50e9dc0
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_1_X_2024-10-21-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/46465/42328/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• You potentially added 1 lines to the logs
• Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 45
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3438304
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 3
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3438281
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 44 files compared)
• Checked 195 log files, 166 edm output root files, 45 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

@cms-sw/db-l2 @cms-sw/dqm-l2 I think we're expecting a patch for HI data-taking soon. It would be great to get this in, please have a look.

+1

+db

• Verbatim backport of make AlcaBeamMonitor hoard less memory #46451
• IB tests already succeeded in CMSSW_14_2_X_2024-10-21-2300 for several OS

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_14_1_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_14_2_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @mandrenguyen, @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

+1